Tópico dos Pneus

[jogador]

Montados os piores pneus do mercado. Agora é aguardar o motor cair para o chão./QUOTE]
Não tenhas medo, tem sido a marca eleita por aqui e não têm deixado a desejar
Pode não ter a maior aderência nem durabilidade do mercado mas é um bom compromisso qualidade preço

 

[jotadani]

Bem, a quem não percebeu, este post foi um pouco sarcástico, em jeito de resposta a um user que postou mais atrás. Nunca na vida coloquei pneus baratuchos, mas também não sou fanático das duas ou três marcas do costume. Pois então, o que é que um tipo como eu faz? Procura reviews e testes de modo a fazer uma escolha informada. Que dizem esses mesmos testes? O da Auto Bild 2021 posiciona-o no 1° lugar de 20 testados, o da ADAC 2021 em 5° e o teste de travagem da Auto Bild 2021 colocado em 3°! Ora agora vejamos os parâmetros da compra que seriam cerca de 7000km por ano, estradas um pouco mal tratadas velocidades nada altas e viatura pesada, muito sinceramente não me parece que tenha feito uma má escolha, até porque os consumos não serão um factor assim tão importante para mim.

 

[Etcetera]

Bem, não sei se não terei de antecipar a troca de dois pneus.

Troco sempre dois a dois, e tinha os Dunlop RT2 da frente já com muito pouco piso. Entraram os Eagle F1 Assym 5 de que falei aqui, para o eixo traseiro.

Ficaram, portanto, na frente, os RT2 que têm cerca de 50k km, sendo apenas os últimos 5k feitos no eixo de tração.

Por esse motivo, embora tenham bastante piso, parece-me que (talvez por terem andado sempre no eixo traseiro, sujeitos a menor esforço) dentro de uns tempos irão começar a perder borracha.

As paredes laterais estão novas , mas o rasto já apresenta um aspeto algo ressequido , o que é estranho porque foram fabricados na última semana de 2018, ou seja, 3 anos.

Pode ser que isto com as esfregas em AE quente no verão melhore, mas não sei…

Alguma opinião?

Acham que posso andar tranquilo e antes do próximo inverno (15.000km), logo coloco dois novos ?

 

[Ruie34]

Alguma opinião?

Acham que posso andar tranquilo e antes do próximo inverno (15.000km), logo coloco dois novos ?

Aquela borracha gretada é dos abusos nas rotundas, e não de borracha ressequida.

 

[GT_racing]

Os energy saver que troquei da traseira do carro da minha senhora com 120mil km, estavam muito mais gretados e nunca deram chatice, até deu pena, ainda agarravam, também só tinham 5 anitos, pelo menos ela nunca ficou virada ao contrário... eheheh!

 

[oruisilva]

Bem, não sei se não terei de antecipar a troca de dois pneus.

Troco sempre dois a dois, e tinha os Dunlop RT2 da frente já com muito pouco piso. Entraram os Eagle F1 Assym 5 de que falei aqui, para o eixo traseiro.

Ficaram, portanto, na frente, os RT2 que têm cerca de 50k km, sendo apenas os últimos 5k feitos no eixo de tração.

Por esse motivo, embora tenham bastante piso, parece-me que (talvez por terem andado sempre no eixo traseiro, sujeitos a menor esforço) dentro de uns tempos irão começar a perder borracha.

As paredes laterais estão novas , mas o rasto já apresenta um aspeto algo ressequido , o que é estranho porque foram fabricados na última semana de 2018, ou seja, 3 anos.

Pode ser que isto com as esfregas em AE quente no verão melhore, mas não sei…

Vai controlando visualmente, mas diria que podes gastar os pneus, sem receios. Numa viatura cá de casa, que, poucos km faz (na ordem os 6000km/ano) os pneus têm muito piso, e mesmo rodando, a borracha vai ficando assim. No teu caso, o facto de terem sido utilizados apenas no eixo traseiro, acaba por origina um desgaste "lento" e começam a aparecer essas pequenas rachadelas, mesmo sendo uma viatura que passa mais tempo na garagem, do que a circular (pneus de 2017, na circunstância). Não esquecer que, mesmo tendo poucos anos, a borracha acaba por ir perdendo as suas qualidades.

Quando fazia 100000km/ano, e usava 2 conjuntos de pneus por ano, nunca tinha estes "problemas".

 

[jolopes]

Vais acabar por gastar os pneus sem problemas. []

 

[nto]

 

[nto]

https://www.tyrereviews.com/Article/2022-Tyre-Reviews-UHP-Summer-Tyre-Test.htm

[TABLE="class: data-breadcrumb"] [TR] [TH]Test [/TH] [TH]#[/TH] [TH]Difference[/TH] [TH]%[/TH]
Dry Braking	1st		100%
Dry Handling	1st		100%
Wet Braking	1st		100%
Wet Handling	1st		100%
Straight Aqua	8th	-3.46 Km/H	96.16%
Curved Aquaplaning	8th	-0.46 m/sec2	84.08%
Subj. Comfort	6th	-1 Points
Noise	4th	+2.2 dB	97.01%
Rolling Resistance	7th	+0.58 kg / t	93.94%

[h=2]Results[/h]
[TD="colspan: 2"][h=2]1st: Continental SportContact 7 [/h][/TD]

[TD="width: 150px"]

• 255/35 R19

[/TD]
[TD]

The best in wet braking and handling by a considerable margin, fastest in the dry with shortest dry braking.
Poor aquaplaning resistance, increased rolling resistance.
The just released Continental SportContact 7 sets a new benchmark in the wet, finishing both tests with an impressive gap to the next best tyre. Fortunately this steller wet performance doesn't come at the expense of dry performance, as the new SC7 is also the fastest in the dry, with the shortest dry braking. The drawbacks, the tyre isn't the strongest in aquaplaning, and is 6% off the best in the rolling resistance test. With such an advantage in the wet the new Continental Sport Contact 7 is a deserving test winner, and with it, a new standard for the UUHP segment.



[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"][h=2]2nd: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S[/h][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150px"]

• 255/35 R19

[/TD]
[TD][TABLE="class: data-breadcrumb"]
[TR]
[TH]Test[/TH]
[TH]#[/TH]
[TH]Difference[/TH]
[TH]%[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dry Braking[/TD]
[TD]2nd[/TD]
[TD]+0.56 M[/TD]
[TD]98.34%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dry Handling[/TD]
[TD]4th[/TD]
[TD]+0.34 s[/TD]
[TD]99.35%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wet Braking[/TD]
[TD]2nd[/TD]
[TD]+2.78 M[/TD]
[TD]94.75%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wet Handling[/TD]
[TD]3rd[/TD]
[TD]+7.87 s[/TD]
[TD]91.36%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Straight Aqua[/TD]
[TD]3rd[/TD]
[TD]-1.97 Km/H[/TD]
[TD]97.81%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Curved Aquaplaning[/TD]
[TD]3rd[/TD]
[TD]-0.3 m/sec2[/TD]
[TD]89.62%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Subj. Comfort[/TD]
[TD]4th[/TD]
[TD]-0.5 Points[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Noise[/TD]
[TD]3rd[/TD]
[TD]+1.7 dB[/TD]
[TD]97.67%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Rolling Resistance[/TD]
[TD]2nd[/TD]
[TD]+0.05 kg / t[/TD]
[TD]99.39%[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Excellent grip in the dry and wet, good aquaplaning resistance, low levels of noise, low rolling resistance.
Lack of steering feel and speed during handling tests.
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4S continues to be a tyre that does everything well, excelling in every test and having a range of abilities no tyre can rival. The negative of the PS4S is the same as always, it has slightly slower steering and worse feedback than the best on test, but this does bring levels of refinement the sportier tyres can't match.



[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"][h=2]3rd: Bridgestone Potenza Sport[/h][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150px"]

• 255/35 R19

[/TD]
[TD][TABLE="class: data-breadcrumb"]
[TR]
[TH]Test[/TH]
[TH]#[/TH]
[TH]Difference[/TH]
[TH]%[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dry Braking[/TD]
[TD]4th[/TD]
[TD]+2.23 M[/TD]
[TD]93.7%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dry Handling[/TD]
[TD]3rd[/TD]
[TD]+0.21 s[/TD]
[TD]99.6%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wet Braking[/TD]
[TD]3rd[/TD]
[TD]+3.28 M[/TD]
[TD]93.86%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wet Handling[/TD]
[TD]2nd[/TD]
[TD]+5.33 s[/TD]
[TD]93.98%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Straight Aqua[/TD]
[TD]7th[/TD]
[TD]-3.2 Km/H[/TD]
[TD]96.45%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Curved Aquaplaning[/TD]
[TD]5th[/TD]
[TD]-0.38 m/sec2[/TD]
[TD]86.85%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Subj. Comfort[/TD]
[TD]10th[/TD]
[TD]-2 Points[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Noise[/TD]
[TD]8th[/TD]
[TD]+3.1 dB[/TD]
[TD]95.83%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Rolling Resistance[/TD]
[TD]10th[/TD]
[TD]+1.31 kg / t[/TD]
[TD]87.32%[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Excellent in the dry with quick handling and sharp steering, very good in the wet.
Low aquaplaning resistance, high levels of noise, lowest comfort on test, highest rolling resistance on test.

The Bridgestone Potenza Sport continues to be an exciting tyre to drive, with sporty handling and excellent dynamic properties in the dry and wet. This does compromise the aquaplaning ability, comfort levels and rolling resistance of the tyre, and as the only tyre with the starting tread depth below 7mm, this is a tyre for the enthusiast that prioritises driving enjoyment.



[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"][h=2]4th: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport[/h][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150px"]

• 255/35 R19

[/TD]
[TD][TABLE="class: data-breadcrumb"]
[TR]
[TH]Test[/TH]
[TH]#[/TH]
[TH]Difference[/TH]
[TH]%[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dry Braking[/TD]
[TD]3rd[/TD]
[TD]+1.89 M[/TD]
[TD]94.61%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dry Handling[/TD]
[TD]2nd[/TD]
[TD]+0.02 s[/TD]
[TD]99.96%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wet Braking[/TD]
[TD]7th[/TD]
[TD]+6.52 M[/TD]
[TD]88.49%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wet Handling[/TD]
[TD]8th[/TD]
[TD]+10.75 s[/TD]
[TD]88.56%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Straight Aqua[/TD]
[TD]10th[/TD]
[TD]-4.84 Km/H[/TD]
[TD]94.63%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Curved Aquaplaning[/TD]
[TD]6th[/TD]
[TD]-0.39 m/sec2[/TD]
[TD]86.51%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Subj. Comfort[/TD]
[TD]9th[/TD]
[TD]-1.5 Points[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Noise[/TD]
[TD]10th[/TD]
[TD]+3.6 dB[/TD]
[TD]95.19%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Rolling Resistance[/TD]
[TD]6th[/TD]
[TD]+0.54 kg / t[/TD]
[TD]94.38%[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Excellent in the dry with the best dry handling and short dry braking distances.
Low grip in the wet with long wet braking distances, low aquaplaning resistance, noisiest tyre on test, low levels of comfort.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport once again proves itself to be one of the best road bias tyres if you're interested in taking your car on track. Unfortunately, that does come at the expense of some road manners, such as wet performance and comfort levels but this is still the tyre to pick if you're planning track work.



[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"][h=2]5th: Nankang Sportnex AS2+[/h][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150px"]

• 255/35 R19

[/TD]
[TD][TABLE="class: data-breadcrumb"]
[TR]
[TH]Test[/TH]
[TH]#[/TH]
[TH]Difference[/TH]
[TH]%[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dry Braking[/TD]
[TD]9th[/TD]
[TD]+4.31 M[/TD]
[TD]88.5%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dry Handling[/TD]
[TD]8th[/TD]
[TD]+2.24 s[/TD]
[TD]95.88%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wet Braking[/TD]
[TD]4th[/TD]
[TD]+5.77 M[/TD]
[TD]89.68%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wet Handling[/TD]
[TD]4th[/TD]
[TD]+8.45 s[/TD]
[TD]90.78%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Straight Aqua[/TD]
[TD]2nd[/TD]
[TD]-0.64 Km/H[/TD]
[TD]99.29%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Curved Aquaplaning[/TD]
[TD]2nd[/TD]
[TD]-0.12 m/sec2[/TD]
[TD]95.85%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Subj. Comfort[/TD]
[TD]1st[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Noise[/TD]
[TD]1st[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD]100%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Rolling Resistance[/TD]
[TD]3rd[/TD]
[TD]+0.18 kg / t[/TD]
[TD]98.04%[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Good grip in the wet, high aquaplaning resistance, quietest tyre on test, excellent levels of comfort, low rolling resistance, low purchase price.
Poor grip in the dry with oversteer balance.
The Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ punched above its price category, beating the more established brands of Kumho and Toyo. The tyre might not have been the most dynamic in the dry, but it performed well in all the wet testing and had good levels of comfort, low noise, and low rolling resistance. The AS2+ does seem more comfort than performance bias, but it's still an impressive set of results for the price point.

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"][h=2]6th: Kumho Ecsta PS71[/h][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150px"]

• 255/35 R19

[/TD]
[TD][TABLE="class: data-breadcrumb"]
[TR]
[TH]Test[/TH]
[TH]#[/TH]
[TH]Difference[/TH]
[TH]%[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dry Braking[/TD]
[TD]6th[/TD]
[TD]+3.41 M[/TD]
[TD]90.68%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dry Handling[/TD]
[TD]7th[/TD]
[TD]+1.78 s[/TD]
[TD]96.7%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wet Braking[/TD]
[TD]5th[/TD]
[TD]+6.05 M[/TD]
[TD]89.23%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wet Handling[/TD]
[TD]7th[/TD]
[TD]+10.62 s[/TD]
[TD]88.69%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Straight Aqua[/TD]
[TD]1st[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD]100%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Curved Aquaplaning[/TD]
[TD]1st[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD]100%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Subj. Comfort[/TD]
[TD]8th[/TD]
[TD]-1.2 Points[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Noise[/TD]
[TD]9th[/TD]
[TD]+3.5 dB[/TD]
[TD]95.32%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Rolling Resistance[/TD]
[TD]4th[/TD]
[TD]+0.3 kg / t[/TD]
[TD]96.77%[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Highest aquaplaning resistance on test, low rolling resistance.
Poor grip in the dry and wet.
The Kumho Ecsta PS71 seems to have put all its eggs in the deep water basket, where it excelled, however a tyre needs to perform well in more than a single category, and unfortunately the PS71 struggled in the dry and wet, in both braking and handling.

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"][h=2]7th: Toyo Proxes Sport A[/h][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150px"]

• 255/35 R19

[/TD]
[TD][TABLE="class: data-breadcrumb"]
[TR]
[TH]Test[/TH]
[TH]#[/TH]
[TH]Difference[/TH]
[TH]%[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dry Braking[/TD]
[TD]7th[/TD]
[TD]+3.66 M[/TD]
[TD]90.06%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dry Handling[/TD]
[TD]5th[/TD]
[TD]+1.08 s[/TD]
[TD]97.97%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wet Braking[/TD]
[TD]9th[/TD]
[TD]+10.87 M[/TD]
[TD]82.18%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wet Handling[/TD]
[TD]5th[/TD]
[TD]+8.51 s[/TD]
[TD]90.72%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Straight Aqua[/TD]
[TD]5th[/TD]
[TD]-2.41 Km/H[/TD]
[TD]97.32%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Curved Aquaplaning[/TD]
[TD]8th[/TD]
[TD]-0.46 m/sec2[/TD]
[TD]84.08%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Subj. Comfort[/TD]
[TD]1st[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Noise[/TD]
[TD]5th[/TD]
[TD]+2.3 dB[/TD]
[TD]96.88%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Rolling Resistance[/TD]
[TD]9th[/TD]
[TD]+0.67 kg / t[/TD]
[TD]93.06%[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Predictable wet handling, good straight aquaplaning performance, good leves of comfort.
Long braking distances in the dry and wet, high rolling resistance.
The Toyo Proxes Sport A peaked in comfort testing and wet handling, where the tyre was predictable, but the levels of grip in the dry and wet were average at best, and the tyre had long braking distances in both tests.

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"][h=2]8th: Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+[/h][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150px"]

• 255/35 R19

[/TD]
[TD][TABLE="class: data-breadcrumb"]
[TR]
[TH]Test[/TH]
[TH]#[/TH]
[TH]Difference[/TH]
[TH]%[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dry Braking[/TD]
[TD]8th[/TD]
[TD]+3.68 M[/TD]
[TD]90.01%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dry Handling[/TD]
[TD]6th[/TD]
[TD]+1.35 s[/TD]
[TD]97.48%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wet Braking[/TD]
[TD]6th[/TD]
[TD]+6.18 M[/TD]
[TD]89.03%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wet Handling[/TD]
[TD]6th[/TD]
[TD]+10.33 s[/TD]
[TD]88.96%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Straight Aqua[/TD]
[TD]6th[/TD]
[TD]-2.97 Km/H[/TD]
[TD]96.7%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Curved Aquaplaning[/TD]
[TD]7th[/TD]
[TD]-0.4 m/sec2[/TD]
[TD]86.16%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Subj. Comfort[/TD]
[TD]1st[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Noise[/TD]
[TD]6th[/TD]
[TD]+2.4 dB[/TD]
[TD]96.74%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Rolling Resistance[/TD]
[TD]8th[/TD]
[TD]+0.62 kg / t[/TD]
[TD]93.55%[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Good levels of comfort.
Poor grip in the wet and dry, average aquaplaning resistance, high rolling resistance.
The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+ was a comfortable performance tyre, but the comfort came at the cost of handling, with the Vorti+ feeling woolly with low levels of grip in the dry and wet.

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"][h=2]9th: Goodride SA37[/h][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150px"]

• 255/35 R19

[/TD]
[TD][TABLE="class: data-breadcrumb"]
[TR]
[TH]Test[/TH]
[TH]#[/TH]
[TH]Difference[/TH]
[TH]%[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dry Braking[/TD]
[TD]10th[/TD]
[TD]+4.35 M[/TD]
[TD]88.41%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dry Handling[/TD]
[TD]10th[/TD]
[TD]+2.79 s[/TD]
[TD]94.92%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wet Braking[/TD]
[TD]8th[/TD]
[TD]+10.84 M[/TD]
[TD]82.22%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wet Handling[/TD]
[TD]9th[/TD]
[TD]+13.71 s[/TD]
[TD]85.86%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Straight Aqua[/TD]
[TD]4th[/TD]
[TD]-1.99 Km/H[/TD]
[TD]97.79%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Curved Aquaplaning[/TD]
[TD]4th[/TD]
[TD]-0.32 m/sec2[/TD]
[TD]88.93%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Subj. Comfort[/TD]
[TD]4th[/TD]
[TD]-0.5 Points[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Noise[/TD]
[TD]6th[/TD]
[TD]+2.4 dB[/TD]
[TD]96.74%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Rolling Resistance[/TD]
[TD]1st[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[TD]100%[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Good straight aquaplaning resistance, low rolling resistance, low purchase price.
Very poor grip in the dry and wet with unbalanced handling.
The mixed budget combination of Goodride and Star Performer created an unbalanced vehicle with unpredictable handling characteristics. Not Recommended.

[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2"][h=2]10th: Federal Evoluzion ST 1[/h][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 150px"]

• 255/35 R19

[/TD]
[TD][TABLE="class: data-breadcrumb"]
[TR]
[TH]Test[/TH]
[TH]#[/TH]
[TH]Difference[/TH]
[TH]%[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dry Braking[/TD]
[TD]5th[/TD]
[TD]+3.19 M[/TD]
[TD]91.23%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Dry Handling[/TD]
[TD]9th[/TD]
[TD]+2.41 s[/TD]
[TD]95.58%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wet Braking[/TD]
[TD]10th[/TD]
[TD]+13.93 M[/TD]
[TD]78.25%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Wet Handling[/TD]
[TD]10th[/TD]
[TD]+17.86 s[/TD]
[TD]82.33%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Straight Aqua[/TD]
[TD]9th[/TD]
[TD]-4.81 Km/H[/TD]
[TD]94.66%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Curved Aquaplaning[/TD]
[TD]10th[/TD]
[TD]-0.51 m/sec2[/TD]
[TD]82.35%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Subj. Comfort[/TD]
[TD]6th[/TD]
[TD]-1 Points[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Noise[/TD]
[TD]2nd[/TD]
[TD]+0.5 dB[/TD]
[TD]99.3%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Rolling Resistance[/TD]
[TD]5th[/TD]
[TD]+0.42 kg / t[/TD]
[TD]95.59%[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Low external noise, low purchase price.
Extremely low grip in the wet with long wet braking distances and difficult to control handling, low aquaplaning resistance, low grip in the dry with poor handling.
The Federal Evolution ST-1 has poor grip in every condition, and dangerously long wet braking distances. Not recommended.

[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

 

[Icas]

O que quer dizer UHP?

 

[nto]

O que quer dizer UHP?

Ultra-high performance (UHP)

 

[Next]

Novos sapatos para o A4 devem chegar quarta Continental PC6 135€ cada, 225/50R17[]

 

[Icas]

Novos sapatos para o A4 devem chegar quarta Continental PC6 135€ cada, 225/50R17[]

E em 205/55 R17, há?

 

[Next]

E em 205/55 R17, há?

Sim existe essa medida também
Pneu automóvel Continental Conti-PremiumContact 6 205/55 R17 95 V XL (pneus-online.pt)

 

[nto]

 

[Icas]

A versão anterior é boa?

 

[nto]

A versão anterior é boa?

São. []

 

[nto]

https://www.pneusnews.it/2022/03/02...ndinblue&utm_campaign=220302&utm_medium=email

 

[nto]

https://www.tyrereviews.com/Article/2022-Summer-Tyre-Market-Overview.htm



[h=2]Dry[/h]



Dry Braking353637383940Nokian PowerProofKumho Ecsta HS52Hankook Ventus Prime 4Bridgestone Turanza T005Toyo Proxes ComfortDunlop SportMaxx RT 2Vredestein UltracMichelin Primacy 4Sava Intensa UHP 2BFGoodrich AdvantageKleber Dynaxer HP4Continental EcoContact 6Debica Presto UHP2Fulda SportControl 2Laufenn S Fit EQ PlusFalken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRunGoodyear EfficientGrip PeGT Radial FE2Tomket Sport 3 Series 3Nexen N Fera PrimusGoodride SA57Maxxis Premitra HP5Starmaxx Ultra Sport ST76Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51Infinity EcomaxFirestone RoadHawkUniroyal RainSport 5Hifly HF805Tyfoon Successor 5Roadstone Eurovis Sport 0Tracmax X Privilo TX3Zeetex HP2000 vfmLassa DriveWaysAplus A607Cooper Zeon CS8Delinte DH2General Altimax One SAtlas Sport Green 2Firemax FM601Viking Protech NewgenRotalla RU01 S PaceSemperit Speed Life 3Barum Bravuris 5HMImperial Ecosport 2Dry braking in meters. (100 - 0 km/h)Tyre

Tyre	Dry braking in meters
Nokian PowerProof	35.7
Kumho Ecsta HS52	35.7
Hankook Ventus Prime 4	35.8
Bridgestone Turanza T005	35.8
Toyo Proxes Comfort	35.9
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2	36.1
Vredestein Ultrac	36.1
Michelin Primacy 4	36.2
Sava Intensa UHP 2	36.2
BFGoodrich Advantage	36.3
Kleber Dynaxer HP4	36.3
Continental EcoContact 6	36.4
Debica Presto UHP2	36.5
Fulda SportControl 2	36.5
Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus	36.5
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun	36.5
Goodyear EfficientGrip Pe	36.8
GT Radial FE2	37
Tomket Sport 3 Series 3	37.2
Nexen N Fera Primus	37.2
Goodride SA57	37.3
Maxxis Premitra HP5	37.3
Starmaxx Ultra Sport ST76	37.5
Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51	37.7
Infinity Ecomax	37.7
Firestone RoadHawk	37.7
Uniroyal RainSport 5	38.4
Hifly HF805	38.5
Tyfoon Successor 5	38.5
Roadstone Eurovis Sport 0	38.7
Tracmax X Privilo TX3	38.9
Zeetex HP2000 vfm	38.9
Lassa DriveWays	39
Aplus A607	39
Cooper Zeon CS8	39.1
Delinte DH2	39.1
General Altimax One S	39.3
Atlas Sport Green 2	39.5
Firemax FM601	39.8
Viking Protech Newgen	39.8
Rotalla RU01 S Pace	39.8
Semperit Speed Life 3	40
Barum Bravuris 5HM	40
Imperial Ecosport 2	40.3

[h=2]Wet[/h]



Wet Braking262830323436Bridgestone Turanza T005Hankook Ventus Prime 4Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRunVredestein UltracKumho Ecsta HS52Nexen N Fera PrimusDunlop SportMaxx RT 2Maxxis Premitra HP5Nokian PowerProofMichelin Primacy 4Fulda SportControl 2Toyo Proxes ComfortGT Radial FE2Goodyear EfficientGrip PeKleber Dynaxer HP4Debica Presto UHP2Sava Intensa UHP 2BFGoodrich AdvantageGoodride SA57Cooper Zeon CS8Laufenn S Fit EQ PlusHifly HF805Tyfoon Successor 5Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51Delinte DH2Roadstone Eurovis Sport 0Continental EcoContact 6Infinity EcomaxTomket Sport 3 Series 3Firestone RoadHawkStarmaxx Ultra Sport ST76General Altimax One SSemperit Speed Life 3Barum Bravuris 5HMViking Protech NewgenUniroyal RainSport 5Imperial Ecosport 2Aplus A607Zeetex HP2000 vfmTracmax X Privilo TX3Lassa DriveWaysRotalla RU01 S PaceFiremax FM601Atlas Sport Green 2Wet braking in meters. (80 - 0 km/h)Tyre

Tyre	Wet braking in meters
Bridgestone Turanza T005	27.5
Hankook Ventus Prime 4	27.8
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun	27.9
Vredestein Ultrac	28.2
Kumho Ecsta HS52	28.6
Nexen N Fera Primus	28.6
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2	28.8
Maxxis Premitra HP5	28.9
Nokian PowerProof	28.9
Michelin Primacy 4	29.3
Fulda SportControl 2	29.4
Toyo Proxes Comfort	29.6
GT Radial FE2	29.7
Goodyear EfficientGrip Pe	29.7
Kleber Dynaxer HP4	29.8
Debica Presto UHP2	29.8
Sava Intensa UHP 2	29.9
BFGoodrich Advantage	31
Goodride SA57	31.3
Cooper Zeon CS8	31.3
Laufenn S Fit EQ Plus	31.9
Hifly HF805	32
Tyfoon Successor 5	32.1
Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51	32.2
Delinte DH2	32.6
Roadstone Eurovis Sport 0	32.6
Continental EcoContact 6	32.7
Infinity Ecomax	32.7
Tomket Sport 3 Series 3	32.8
Firestone RoadHawk	32.8
Starmaxx Ultra Sport ST76	32.9
General Altimax One S	32.9
Semperit Speed Life 3	33.1
Barum Bravuris 5HM	33.3
Viking Protech Newgen	33.4
Uniroyal RainSport 5	33.5
Imperial Ecosport 2	33.8
Aplus A607	33.9
Zeetex HP2000 vfm	33.9
Tracmax X Privilo TX3	34.3
Lassa DriveWays	34.9
Rotalla RU01 S Pace	35.1
Firemax FM601	36
Atlas Sport Green 2	36.6

[h=2][/h]

 

[Carmaniaco90]

Tópico dos Pneus

Michelin Primacy HP, de 2015.

Ainda agarram bastante bem, têm ainda bom piso, em molhado nunca tive qualquer problema.

Contudo, têm essas fissuras. A ideia era aguentar mais 1 ano.